Smart money signals

Four kinds of smart-money buying, cross-referenced on one board: insider clusters, large insider purchases, buys by insiders with proven track records, and U.S. Senate purchases. When two or more fire on the same stock, it lands in the confluence list — a view no other free tracker builds.

Signal confluence

Stocks where 2+ distinct signal types fired in the last 30 days
No multi-signal confluence right now. Genuine convergence — several independent kinds of smart money buying the same stock in the same month — is rare, which is exactly what makes it worth watching. The strongest individual signals are below, and this board updates continuously.

Strongest individual signals

The best of each signal type from the last 30 days

Insider cluster buys All →

Multiple insiders, same stock, two weeks

TSM 8 insiders · $40K Jun 5, 2026
STRR 5 insiders · $354K Jun 9, 2026
BZUN 2 insiders · $295K Jun 10, 2026
RCG 2 insiders · $14K Jun 11, 2026

Largest insider buys All →

Open-market purchases of $100K+

ACLOX $150K by Ross Andrew May 14, 2026

Proven insiders buying All →

60%+ win rate over 5+ scored buys

NUVB Mashal Robert (80% win rate) — $118K Jun 9, 2026
CLST Kleiser Kirk E. (86% win rate) — $46K Jun 10, 2026
CLST Kleiser Kirk E. (86% win rate) — $38K Jun 10, 2026
APCX Lord Albert L (88% win rate) — $34K Jun 4, 2026

Congress buying All →

Senate purchases under the STOCK Act

KHC Sen. Gary C Peters · $1,001 - $15,000 May 21, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What counts as "confluence"?

At least two different kinds of smart-money buying on the same stock within 30 days — for example an insider cluster plus a Senate purchase, or a $1M insider buy plus a purchase by an insider with a proven track record. Repeats of the same signal type strengthen the score but don't create confluence on their own.

Why these four signals?

Each is independently documented and comes from a primary source: insider clusters and large buys from SEC Form 4 filings, proven-buyer status from our own win-rate scoring of every insider's past purchases, and Congress trades from official STOCK Act disclosures. They're different actors with different information — which is why agreement between them is interesting.

Why is the confluence list often short or empty?

Because real convergence is rare. Congress disclosures can lag trades by 45 days, and genuine insider clusters happen only a handful of times a month — so overlap within one window is the exception, not the rule. An empty board is the honest output, not a bug.

Should I buy stocks on this board?

Treat it as a research starting point, never a recommendation. Smart money can be early, wrong, or trading for reasons that don't apply to you. InsiderSource is an information tool, not investment advice.